Does Chinas Growing Military Power Pose A Threat To The Region

Introduction In the beginning of the year 2007, the Chinese government increased its expenditure on military and over 45 million dollars was invested. According to experts, Beijing has always understated its defence budget by even over 50%. The budget is estimated to have increased considerably as over the past two years, Beijing has conducted some anti-satellite tests.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Does ‘China’s Growing Military Power’ Pose A Threat To The Region? specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More This has raised concerns that the military growth of china could cause a threat in the area since it has not exposed much of its operations to the US foreign policy. The rapid growth of the Chinese economy and its increased and vigorous engagement in diplomatic issues within the region and the whole world at large is critical. This is what brings about the discussion of the peaceful rise that china has undergone to achieve very powerful status in the world economy and democracy. Furthermore, the pentagon has noted that China could be the only hegemony on the basis that it can challenge the unipolar power of the US. The two perspectives of China as a very good global economic associate and a military superpower are challenged by the military budget. Chinese Perspective of their Military The Chinese indicate that the increasing military investment is just a sign of economic prosperity and should not be taken as a security threat in the region despite that fact that China has the capacity to manufacture ballistic weapons (Chen Feffer, 2009, p. 48). Basically the Chinese authorities affirm that the increased military expenditure and increased recruitment and training are only intended for the better and not for threatening the world. They site issues like better payments for their troops and so on. Critics, nonetheless critics dispute this with an argument that China immeasurabl y underreports what it spends in military (Chen Feffer, 2009, p. 53). Furthermore the nation does not disclose why it has been acquiring innovative power-projections capacities that could transform the regional power balance. Determining which of the claims is actually correct is not an easy job. In the recent past, China has published reports of its yearly expenditure in defence budgets and offered justifications for the noted increased military allocation as part of its attempt to reduce the fears the rest of the world is having concerning its rise to dominance (Chen Feffer, 2009, p. 53). However since these reports have figures that do not match what is expected by outside observers, there are many questions that arise than what the Chinese have to offer as their answers to the concerns (Chen Feffer, 2009, p. 53).Advertising Looking for essay on international relations? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Why is it that ther e are so many discrepancies between military budget and other sectors? What are the ultimate Chinese Geopolitical objectives and the reasons behind defence strategy? (Shambaugh, 1994, p. 43). How are other countries in the regions reacting to these investments? And basically what is the implication of the doubtfulness of Chinese military on the country’s national objectives? (Roy, 1996, p. 159) Scepticism Despite the attempts by China to justify and defend its spending on military as being a peaceful doctrine, other nations including the US are still sceptical about the figures that are reported (Goh, 2008, p. 114). The defence Department in the US has been presenting its own reports regarding the capability of China’s military as well as the monetary expenditure. Recent report indicated that the Chinese spent over $105 – $150 billion. The problems with these figures are the China’s accountability (Chen Feffer, 2009, p. 53). The Chinese report indicated only $ 61 billion in 2008 as opposed to the US findings hence presenting the Chinese expenditure as a contentious issue. China Not a Real Threat Essentially is very important to note that there is a very big different between having the capacity to carry out a plan and the actual intent to do it. There are some authorities who believe that China is just seeking to live peacefully with its neighbours and the whole world at large (Goh, 2008, p. 114). Tension has often crept between China and its neighbour and even the US due to increased ventures. The notable one has been a dispute between China and the US over the importation of textile. The Chinese are required to do a better job rather than use unethical means (Zheng, 2005, p. 18). Optimists in the US believe that dialogue is the best way to handle issue with the Chinese. Collaboration can bring about greater development as nations share technology and knowledge (Goh, 2008, p. 114). The relationship between the US and China is more of complement as both nations have strategic plans for their safety and progress. It’s believed that if they worked in collaboration, they could even achieve greater goals (Zheng, 2005, p. 18). The only hitch has been that China has been very secretive. Despite having tested anti-ballistic missiles and took a lot of time before admitting that the test actually happened (Hartfiel Brian, 2004, p. 5). The most important step is to ensure that dialogue prevails as this is the only was that nations can probe solutions. China is an emerging economic superpower that is attracting most nations in business partnerships because it is not only a big nation with a lot of people bust it’s been very aggressive on the international economy (Hartfiel Brian, 2004, p. 8).Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Does ‘China’s Growing Military Power’ Pose A Threat To The Region? specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Lear n More It offers ready market, cheap labour and a free investment opportunity in foreign trade investment. With a population that is increasing over 1.3 billion people, china is a nation to recon as its fast economic track and the subsequent military growth is expected since that nation has to sustain and protect the 1.3 billion people. The former secretary of State, in the United States, Collin Powel indicated that the China’s military ventures were much less than those of pentagon hence not a big threat (Goh, 2008, p. 114). Instead, he urged the nations in the Asian continent to focus their effort on handling the many challenges that are always presents and the opportunities that keep coming and going for their own economic development (Hartfiel Brian, 2004, p. 8). Conclusion There is a universal agreement among many authorities and specialists that the Chinese indeed does not pose a serious threat to the region. The economic prowess and the military growth as well as ot her capacities that China has, this is still too limited to be a serious danger now and even in the near future. Nonetheless, there are fears that in the long term, China could be the nation that can confront others in challenging sovereignty and hegemony concepts. Basically, China is one of the few nations in the whole world that has been able to find an incredible mix of political, military, economic and manpower elements which can be very critical in building a new superpower. China can then be able to exercise hegemony over its neighbours and even on the United States of America. The emergence of China as an economic powerhouse has been accompanied by even more spending in its military. This shows that military has a higher niche in the China’s budget. Though the expenditure has been unjustified by many nations in the regions the matter is still not a serious concern on the international security. Specialist are therefore required to carry out more studies to determine wh ether there is a possibility that China would embark on expansionist or real aggressive course of disrupting peace and stability in the region. Reference List Chen, s Feffer, J. 2009. China’s Military Spending: Soft Rise or Hard Threat? Asian Perspective, Vol. 33, No.4, pp 47 – 67. Goh, E. 2008. â€Å"Great Powers and Hierarchical Order in Southeast Asia: Analyzing Regional Security Strategies,† international Security, Vol. 32, No. 322, No. 3 pp 113 – 157.Advertising Looking for essay on international relations? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Hartfiel, R Brian, L.J. 2004. â€Å"Rising the Risks of War: Defense Spending Trends and Competitive Arms Processes in East Asia,† Pacific Review. Vol. 20, No. 1, pp 1-22 Roy, D. 1996. â€Å"The ‘China Threat’ Issue: Major Arguments,† Asian Survey, Vol. 36, No. 8, pp. 758-771 Shambaugh, D. 1994. â€Å"Growing strong: China’s challenge to Asian security,† Survival Vol. 36, Issue 2, pp 43 – 59. Zheng, B. 2005. â€Å"China’s Peaceful Rise to Great Power Status,† Foreign Affairs, Vol. 84, No. 5, pp 18 – 24. This essay on Does ‘China’s Growing Military Power’ Pose A Threat To The Region? was written and submitted by user Bella Fuentes to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.

Writing the Past BCâ€AD or BCEâ€CE - Proofeds Writing Tips Blog

Writing the Past BC–AD or BCE–CE Writing the Past: BC–AD or BCE–CE? History is big. Very big. This is why we have the terms â€Å"BC† and â€Å"AD,† as well as â€Å"BCE† and â€Å"CE,† which help us keep track of what happened when. But how exactly do these terms work? And which of BC–AD or BCE–CE should you use in your written work? Let’s find out! BC and AD The Bede being venerable. BC stands for â€Å"before Christ.† AD is short for the Latin term â€Å"anno Domini,† which means â€Å"in the year of the Lord.† They came into use thanks to two monks: Dionysius Exiguus (who coined the term â€Å"anno Domini†) and the Venerable Bede (who popularized it). They were originally invented to calculate the correct date of Easter, with AD 1 being the first year after Jesus was born. Today, historians use these terms to denote dates before (BC) and after (AD) the start of the Gregorian calendar, which is the calendar we still use today! The correct positioning for each of these terms is different. BC goes after the date: Julius Caesar was killed in 44 BC. But AD goes before the date: The Woodland period continued until around AD 1,000. Keep in mind that BC involves counting backwards from 1 (so 44 BC is 44 years before 1 BC), while AD involves counting forwards (so AD 1,000 is 1,000 years after AD 1). BCE and CE BCE stands for â€Å"before common era.† CE stands for â€Å"common era.† What is the common era? It’s exactly the same as the time period covered by AD! It therefore includes everything since the start of the Gregorian calendar, whereas BCE covers everything before then. These terms, then, work in exactly the same way as BC and AD. They were simply designed as a secular alternative. In practice, the only difference is that both go after the date: Julius Caesar was killed in 44 BCE. The Woodland period continued until around 1,000 CE. This does at least make it easier to remember the positioning for each term! Which Is Correct? Both! Sorry, not a very helpful answer, but it is true. As explained above, they work in essentially the same way, so the choice between them is largely a matter of preference. You may want to check your style guide if you have one available, since some colleges and publishers prefer one system over the other. And BCE–CE is sometimes considered more modern. If we had to choose, we’d say that BCE–CE is better because the positioning is simpler. But ultimately, it is up to you! The important thing is to pick one system and use it consistently throughout your document. Having your work proofread will make sure this is the case.